Details: CDS3002 Marking Criteria – Assignment 1
Student name:
Marker:
Items
Result
Comments
Introduction and conclusion (10%)
Description(30%)
Research justification (30%)
Application (15%)
Communicating knowledge (15%)
Total out of 100
100
Rubric
Outstanding  8.5-10 marks
High quality 7.5-8.5 marks
Quality 6.5-7.5 marks
Satisfactory 5-6.45 marks
Unsatisfactory 0-5 marks
Introduction and conclusion (Out of 10 marks)
Introduction is engaging and informative. Clear, original thesis. Reader is clear about what paper will address.Summary is very well supported. Strong connection between introduction, body, and conclusion.
Introduction provides a basic or inherited thesis. Summary is well supported. Basic connection between introduction, body, and conclusion.
Insufficient introduction or conclusion. Little connection between introduction, body, and conclusion.
Outstanding  25-30 marks
High quality 22-25 marks
Quality 19-22 marks
Satisfactory 15-19 marks
Unsatisfactory 0-15 marks
Description (Out of 30 marks)
Information included is thoroughly and consistently relevant showing a high degree of understanding of the topic. Highly substantial content. Evidence of extensive and relevant research from high quality scholarly sources. Demonstrated a thorough understanding of concepts. All aspects of the task were completed in great detail. Demonstrated ability to process knowledge at a sophisticated level.
Most information relevant to the topic chosen. Content knowledge displayed was reasonably substantial. Demonstrated a reasonable understanding of concepts. Relevant texts in the field were consulted. Moderate external validation. Moderate argument. Most aspects of the task are completed in detail. Demonstrated ability to process knowledge at a high level.
The work does not meet an acceptable standard.Inadequate knowledge, coverage, and / or analysis. Superficial depth. Essay rambled or lacked continuity. Evidence and /or argument inaccurate or questionable, weak, or absent. Content had little relevance to assigned task, or highlighted peripheral areas. Inappropriate/ inadequate source selection, usage, or inadequate understanding of the source’s content and context. (Primarily relied on secondary sources and/or questionable sources.)
Outstanding  25-30 marks
High quality 22-25 marks
Quality 19-22 marks
Satisfactory 15-19 marks
Unsatisfactory 0-15 marks
Research justification (Out of 30 marks)
Information included is thoroughly and consistently relevant showing a high degree of understanding of the topic. Highly substantial content. Evidence of extensive and relevant research from high quality scholarly sources. Strong research validation and persuasive relevant arguments. Demonstrated a thorough understanding of concepts. All aspects of the task were completed in great detail. Demonstrated ability to process knowledge at a sophisticated level.
Most information relevant to the topic chosen. Content knowledge displayed was reasonably substantial. Demonstrated a reasonable understanding of concepts. Relevant texts in the field were consulted. Moderate external validation. Moderate argument. Most aspects of the task are completed in detail. Demonstrated ability to process knowledge at a high level.
The work does not meet the standard described in the criterion or most of the tasks were incomplete.Inadequate knowledge, coverage, and / or analysis. Superficial depth. Essay rambled or lacked continuity. Evidence and /or argument inaccurate or questionable, weak, or absent. Content had little relevance to assigned task, or highlighted peripheral areas. Inappropriate/ inadequate source selection, usage, or inadequate understanding of the source’s content and context. (Primarily relied on secondary sources and/or questionable sources.)
Outstanding  12.5-15 marks
High quality 11-12.5 marks
Quality  9.5-11 marks
Satisfactory 7.5-9.5 marks
Unsatisfactory 0-7.5 marks
Application (Out of 15 marks)
Information included is thoroughly and consistently relevant showing a high degree of understanding of the topic. Highly substantial content. Evidence of extensive and relevant research from high quality scholarly sources. Strong research validation and persuasive relevant arguments. Demonstrated a thorough understanding of concepts. All aspects of the task were completed in great detail. Demonstrated ability to process knowledge at a sophisticated level.
Most information relevant to the topic chosen. Content knowledge displayed was reasonably substantial. Demonstrated a reasonable understanding of concepts. Relevant texts in the field were consulted. Moderate external validation. Moderate arg…
 

"Do you want an original answer to this question?


Yes No

"Is this question part of your assignment? Essay
.We Can Help!

Order Now